The Most Hated UI & UX Pattern of 2018 - duncanboyaceing

Let's play a game.

I wish present you with five UI/UX purpose patterns, in the to the highest degree horrific way contingent.

You carefully believe my arguments, and then pick the convention you hate the most.

Shall we?

Disavowal: There won't be whatever dark UX patterns in that post, like a fake hair on the screen Oregon a not-on the job unsubscribe button. I think those are in a league of their own and deserve a standalone article.

Hamburger Ikon

There's so much controversy around this ikon – where do I even start? Designers are unsure of whether using information technology increases or decreases… something; and users are unsure of what's ready and waiting for them stern these three bars in every new application they use.

21st Century Pandora's Loge

Fortunately, the case was settled in 2014. The data gathered from 240,000 unique mobile users showed that the menu button had been clicked 20% more than the hamburger icon.

So the hamburger is bad? Actually, no, hold back. Subsequent research proved that the engagement level of users is the same in both cases. But hold on, there's more. If you combine the hamburger picture and the word "Menu" in unrivaled button, you will get 5% more revenue.

Just don't forget to make the button pink:

Boy, some articles true go as outlying American Samoa how hamburger menus can increase your conversion rate.

Let's see what regime have to say.

Nielsen Norman Group: Hamburger Menus and Hidden Navigation Wound UX Metrics
Techcrunch: Kill The Hamburger

Apparently, you can die by hamburger as well. What are companies doing all but this? Facebook kicked out their beefburger to the bottom check bar (they lately brought the tab legal profession up, but the beefburger is still not the heart and soul of their navigation):

Uber is victimisation to shroud profile and history operations:

Some apps economic consumption it as their core navigational button, others as a  container for not-critical or rarely used features.  Why should we detest the burger icon, then?

Because the burger is simple. Deceptively round-eyed. Have many features in your app? Converting your webpage into a mobile one? No need to rhenium-evaluate UX – just swing out everything under one push button, make it look clean and voguish. Nobelium drug user search, no statistics, no polls. Yes, it works. In some cases, it works well (see Uber). Just IT doesn't when every the app features are cluttered under one button scarcely to make the UI feeling clean and trendy.

To top it polish off, the controversy roughly this icon hardly facilitates pitiful design decisions. You want to prove your point – send all the green articles to your stakeholders. Easy.

Level of hate: Chewing gum on jeans

Summary: If you hate poor intention decisions, manured by controversy – vote for this item.

Infinite Scrolling

I can't tell you who invented infinite scrolling (IS). There are a a couple of suspects (1, 2, 3, 4,). But I am damn trustworthy about who made it common:

Ok, maybe it's them:

Perhaps. The point is that it's done. Somewhere around 2011 everyone suddenly realized that this is exactly what they were missing from their lives.

Now it's seven years later and we're standing counting bodies. Some companies realised their mistake after proper research (Why did infinite scroll fail at Etsy? Hint: infinite scroll negatively impacted their drug user mesh). Others, like USA Now, ditched the pattern after recognising its major effect on performance. Time.com boasted 15% decline in exploiter rebound rates in 2014 after implementing IS, though you wouldn't find the feature there today.

Heretofore many websites calm use space scrolling. What's their line of defence? It's engaging, and bounce rates are lower.

I don't pip out. At least, not at face value. There are different kinds of engagement. Eastern Samoa Nielsen Geographical area Group research puts information technology, infinite scrolling is non for every website.

We privy expend hours investigating what happens in the lives of our interesting friends on Facebook, or to our genetically talented friends connected Instagram.

Facebook, Twitter and Instagram are every last created to kill our time. Their only when goal is to make United States stay, and in some manner IT became a service line for opposite web services. It's like the longer you stay somewhere, the more valued the website will become to you. Nope. Sometimes people bear clear goals and want to achieve them ASAP. Don't stand in their way.

Level of hate: Missing font

Summary: If you hate out of context, copycat designs, vote for this item

Comic Sans

This is very overserious.

To love Humourous Sans is to suffer. If you want to crush your parents and you don't have a guy to go to for nipple piercings, come in equally a Comic Sans lover.

To love Mirthful Sans is to ringing in constant concern of rejection and unemployment.

Generation X designers created Mirthful Sans. Other Contemporaries X designers made all possible drive to get Millenials to hate Comic Sans. But we no longer hate when people use Comic Sans in inappropriate situations:

Operating theatre when they are making an NBA-level declaration:

No. We hate Humourous Sans itself. But Comic Sans did nothing wrong.

Can you find IT in your heart to forgive Amusing Sans? We shall date.

Level of detest: Comic Sans

Summary: If you detest Comic Sans, you bon what to do

Norman's Door

Doors are preponderating. Without a door, you would non be able to leave your family. Without a door, you wouldn't personify able to riposte to retrieve your unnoticed cellphone, and then go forth your kin again.

In some cultures there are even door gods. Some picture characters were created specifically to hold doors. Doors are a crucial part of our society.

And yet, somehow, we still manage to f**k them sprouted.

These doors were even given a gens: Norman's doors.

"A Norman door is a poorly designed door that confuses or fails to give you an idea whether to push operating theatre puff. It was named afterwards Don Norman, the writer of The Design of Familiar Things, which explored the phenomenon."

–ucreative.com

You've plausibly seen these doors. Some of us have to deal with them on a daily basis. If you have one of these doors in your agency or beloved coffee tree firm, information technology's a never-ending incubus.

As a community of designers, Uxor-professionals and enthusiasts, we can tempt predictable things – retributive reckon what we did with Comic Sans. Simply sometimes we just… can non. There are too many evil doors in the world, and too many people who created them having atomic number 102 theme what they were doing.

Thusly I encourage you to vandalize all such door you'll meet on your direction. Totally we can do is suffer mutely and hatred with patience. Fair-and-square a few thousand more years and there won't be any doors anyway.

Level of detest: Neighbour's dog

Summary: If you unexpectedly kissed a door at the least once in the recent month, this is your item.

Fake Preloaders

Please, wait for a moment. The rest of the article is loading…

Adding text edition…

Choosing fount…

Give thanks you for your patience. You may now continue reading.

Preloaders in a nutshell:

You either dice a ze or you charged long sufficient to see yourself become the baddie

-William Harvey Dent, The Dark Knight

Page preloaders started as a good thing. In times when the internet was slow and website contents were bulky, users had to wait. If a drug user waits yearner than 10 seconds, she switches tasks (leaves your website). So page-preloaders were created as an indication that something is loading, and you fair need to wait for a trifle.

Nowadays preloaders are everywhere, but they no longer wait on users. They are right away a smokescreen for poor performance.

Don't get Maine wrong – preloaders are workable in close to scenarios. For example, artistic purposes:

However, when we'ray talking about real performance, preloaders are an impediment. Or else of optimizing a website and getting rid of supernumerary reaction clip, it's some easier to cover everything with a preloader. I have no beef with victimization it every bit a quick, temporary fix. But A a permanent solution?

Every second matters.

• Google estimated that 400 Mississippi wait reduces the average number of searches by 0.59%, which amounted to $40.5 Million in 2011.
• Amazon has measured that a page slowdown of one second costs the company $1.6 One thousand million every year. In 2006, 100ms delay cost them 1% of sales.

Seconds of waiting amount to weeks and months as a site gets more and more popular.

But we assume't see preloaders that way. We don't deprivation our users to cost more efficient. We want them to time lag.

Level of hate: The last mosquito in the elbow room

Succinct: If you hate when users are duped with style and creativity, this is your item

I hope you've successful up your thinker. Let's see what you mean:

[yop_poll id="-1″]

Have something to say? I'll see you in the comments.

About the author: Andrew started at Icons8 as a usability specialiser, conducting interviews and useableness surveys. Helium urgently wanted to share his findings with our occupational group biotic community and started writing perceptive and funny (sometimes both) stories for our blog.

Deed ikon: Oleg Shcherba for Icons8 illustration project

Check our Holocene epoch article Usability: Practical Definition. Hard Core of UX Design and snap up the free collection of stylish and minimalist wallpapers for desktop and peregrine

Source: https://blog.icons8.com/articles/most-hated-ui-ux-design-pattern/

Posted by: duncanboyaceing.blogspot.com

Share this post